26 Oct 2007

Porn on Wikipedia

You're damn right it is!

After yesterday complaining about the relative lack of historical tomes and recordings of the history of porn, it seems that the lack of documentary evidence on the subject is spreading to Wikipedia as well.

We all know that most Wikipedia editors are borderline Gestapo in their policing of what is admittedly a wonderful resources for researching most subjects. Some of them actually seem to think it makes them incredibly important.

Some of them think they can apply the same editing criteria to every subject, so should you actually want to edit a porn article, you'll often find your change undone by some cretin who knows nothing about the subject.

And that pisses me off because the site's coverage pornography is completely poor. If you're looking for the biggest and best websites on there, for instance, forget it - you will hardly find a single one, which is frankly astonishing.

Much like somebody branched out and made a porn version of YouTube somebody now need to branch out and make sure there is a pornographic version of Wikipedia as well. And do you know what it should be called?

Fuckipedia.

And if anyone out there is even contemplating going out there and using that, then forget it because I'm going to trademark it now.

I'd have preferred Dickipedia but somebody already took that for someone else. Bugger.

Posted by Steve 10:15:00